At the PASO conference, the practical sessions are set up in 2 sessions, one running from 8:30-noon, and the second running from 2:00-5ish.
On the second day, we started with the footwork necessary to make the false-counterattack / false-parry actions work; the role of the half-step or check-step is crucial, since it creates the illusion that the distance is either expanding or collapsing faster than the opponent might want. Buckie also ran us through some footwork exercises involving catching gloves and dodging extension cords.
We reviewed video of the Nam/Salvatori bout from the 2007 Women's Foil Grand Prix in Japan, as an example of a bout where tactical progressions from half-steps were really well-defined, and then did tactical progressions off the false-counterattack. Buckie also showed a more traditional technical lesson.
The final day was spent working on a variety of parries (extended v. medium distance v. close), and actually teaching the techniques necessary to hit at infighting distance. We wrapped up with a soccer game, an off-campus fiesta (alcohol isn't allowed on the OTC grounds), and then many of the attendees went out dancing before coming home to catch their 4:30am airport shuttles.
All in all, I'd say the conference was a success. The Olympic Training Center itself is a special environment; when you're there, you're surrounded by people whose purpose is helping others achieve greatness, and you have to be pretty jaded for that not to rub off. More important, it was inspiring to work alongside so many people who shared a common motivation - there was a divergent set of skills, but everybody in my group wanted to learn as much as possible.
The USOC International Relations group and the USFA (specifically Andrea) put in a large amount of time and effort into making this work well, and it showed. Hopefully the USFA can show that it used its grant money well, because this was an excellent opportunity for the domestic coaches who came. If this type of conference becomes more commonplace, it will only be good for our zonal relationships (a good thing -- stronger fencers in our zone mean stronger competitions outside of Europe) as well as the development of American coaches.
My advice for anybody who goes to such a conference (whether USFCA, Coaches' College, or something similar to this) is to maximize the number of teachable moments. They may come in the formal instruction, but often the moments that stick are little tidbits in a lecturer's ADD tangent, an extra Q&A session in the weight room, or something shared over a beer.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
Thursday, July 23, 2009
PASO Day 3 / 4
The final lecture session was "Creating a Periodized Plan" by a USOC Strength & Conditioning Specialist. Again, it was good information, nothing particularly specific, just a set of general principles on how to build a periodized training plan. He also followed up with a second S&C lecture which talked about the relationships between S&C properties - Force, Power, Strength, etc, and how development of those properties fits together.
During the lunch session, the group went to Garden of the Gods; most of the American coaches had been there before, so we stuck back and I explored the now-defunct library. If you call ahead, you can still get access.
We got split up into groups by weapon and introduced to the practical instructors.
Buckie Leach is doing the practical sessions for foil, and today's topic was "Active Defense". The system is structured around idea that a foilist can be enticed to finish their attack, given the correct distance. We primarily worked actions off false-counterattack (parry-riposte, counterattack, getaway-go), and false-parry (parry-riposte, counterattack, hit-getaway).
I don't have enough information to write about the epee or sabre, but I will if I can find that info.
During the lunch session, the group went to Garden of the Gods; most of the American coaches had been there before, so we stuck back and I explored the now-defunct library. If you call ahead, you can still get access.
We got split up into groups by weapon and introduced to the practical instructors.
Buckie Leach is doing the practical sessions for foil, and today's topic was "Active Defense". The system is structured around idea that a foilist can be enticed to finish their attack, given the correct distance. We primarily worked actions off false-counterattack (parry-riposte, counterattack, getaway-go), and false-parry (parry-riposte, counterattack, hit-getaway).
I don't have enough information to write about the epee or sabre, but I will if I can find that info.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Notes from Mike Pederson's Presentation
Mike Pederson Presentation - The Road to Beijing (MS Word .doc)
These are my notes; they contain much of the material that Mike wrote and some extra paraphrasing on my part. Any misrepresentations are my fault.
These are my notes; they contain much of the material that Mike wrote and some extra paraphrasing on my part. Any misrepresentations are my fault.
PASO Day 2
Our first session on Day 2 was "Implementing Performance Thinking Training" by a USOC Sport Psychologist. It's something I've thought a lot about, but not in terms of "sport psychology" and more in human terms - how do I put my athlete into a place where they can express themselves as a fencer? The biggest tag in the presentation that caught my attention: "You are doing it anyway, might as well conscious and systematic."
For those interested, the USOC has some mental training resources available for sale. I haven't done more than a cursory glance, but they look well-prepared and will likely be an addition to my library.
The second session was done by Alex Ryjik, the owner of Virginia Academy of Fencing, titled "Fencing Clubs in the US." More than anything, I felt the cultural divide here - it was educational on how the club system worked in the US, and specifically how VAF (one of the more business-savvy clubs in the country) worked, but for an audience whose stated interest was achieving high-performance goals, I'm not really sure it fit. One of the interesting tidbits was from an attendee, who pointed out that in his country, fencing clubs were not allowed to make a profit! We often complain about how other fencing powers have it easy with state sponsorship, but we're hardly the worst-case scenario.
The third session was "Deveoping a Strength & Conditioning Program", by the USOC's S&C coordinator. None of the material was groundbreaking, but the general principles established were sound, and it covered a lot of ground. I would have loved to see more specific examples -- I'm quite curious about assessment (especially when we're talking about imbalances which develop through hours of skill training), and ended up cornering the presenter in the weight room for a half-hour in the evening.
The final session, "Optimal Nutrition to Enhance Performance," fell a bit flat for me. On one hand, the hydration, supplement, and general ideas were fine. The few specific recommendations seemed off. Or as another attendee put it, "I think that's the first time I've ever been told to eat MORE carbs." However, she did specify that her background was in endurance sports, specifically cycling, which would explain some of the discrepancies. However, the general recommendations on how to create a nutrition plan made a lot of sense, while eliminating the tedium of trying to track down every last calorie.
I do have the material from these presentations, but want to check with the appropriate people before making it available.
For those interested, the USOC has some mental training resources available for sale. I haven't done more than a cursory glance, but they look well-prepared and will likely be an addition to my library.
The second session was done by Alex Ryjik, the owner of Virginia Academy of Fencing, titled "Fencing Clubs in the US." More than anything, I felt the cultural divide here - it was educational on how the club system worked in the US, and specifically how VAF (one of the more business-savvy clubs in the country) worked, but for an audience whose stated interest was achieving high-performance goals, I'm not really sure it fit. One of the interesting tidbits was from an attendee, who pointed out that in his country, fencing clubs were not allowed to make a profit! We often complain about how other fencing powers have it easy with state sponsorship, but we're hardly the worst-case scenario.
The third session was "Deveoping a Strength & Conditioning Program", by the USOC's S&C coordinator. None of the material was groundbreaking, but the general principles established were sound, and it covered a lot of ground. I would have loved to see more specific examples -- I'm quite curious about assessment (especially when we're talking about imbalances which develop through hours of skill training), and ended up cornering the presenter in the weight room for a half-hour in the evening.
The final session, "Optimal Nutrition to Enhance Performance," fell a bit flat for me. On one hand, the hydration, supplement, and general ideas were fine. The few specific recommendations seemed off. Or as another attendee put it, "I think that's the first time I've ever been told to eat MORE carbs." However, she did specify that her background was in endurance sports, specifically cycling, which would explain some of the discrepancies. However, the general recommendations on how to create a nutrition plan made a lot of sense, while eliminating the tedium of trying to track down every last calorie.
I do have the material from these presentations, but want to check with the appropriate people before making it available.
Monday, July 20, 2009
PASO Day 1
The PASO Conference is divided up into two sessions: Theory and Practical. The theory session encompasses the first three days, and the practical work will all happen during the final three. We started off with a welcome from the usual suspects: Kurt, Andrea, Sunil, as well as the head of the USOC, and a typical visitors' tour of the OTC complex.
The first session was by Mike Pederson, entitled "The Road to Beijing" in which he gave an overview of what he considers are the most important factors to making athletes successful at the elite level. I took copious notes and will post them shortly.
After lunch, we got an introduction to the software package Dartfish, given by a USOC Sports Services staff member. Most of the information is available on the Dartfish website, but it was interesting to see the potential uses of the software, which has two main purposes: collecting and visualizing video data, and tracking and tagging the same video.
The video overlay comparisons were fairly cool, but I was most intrigued by the software's ability to capture sensor data. They did some neat things with pressure plates and accelerometers to measure the acceleration of a weightlifter's bar, graphing that data alongside video of the lift itself. Those technologies may not be commercially available -- I was told they were created in-house -- so it is uncertain if coaches in the fencing community could duplicate some of the more interesting uses of the software. It is, however, a useful opposition research tool, as long as enough video source material is collected and properly tagged.
The final session was again run by Mike Pederson, who talked about how he does opponent research without Dartfish. He notes the position on the strip of a touch, and an abbreviation of the phrase. The advantage of this method over video is that it can be easily done in real-time at a tournament without needing to go back, parse, and classify every action. You're still looking for the same thing -- trends and tendencies in where people prefer to be on the strip, as well as what actions they favor. We've done this at several NWFC camps, and if I can find those materials, I'll post them here as well.
Most of the coaches here are from Caribbean and Central/South American countries, so Spanish is the most-spoken language. The USOC has flown in people to do real-time translation via radio earpieces. I understand we're the guinea pigs for this system, which seems to be working well.
Day 1 is in the books; Day 2 should be more technical, with sport psych, strength & conditioning, and nutrition lectures.
The first session was by Mike Pederson, entitled "The Road to Beijing" in which he gave an overview of what he considers are the most important factors to making athletes successful at the elite level. I took copious notes and will post them shortly.
After lunch, we got an introduction to the software package Dartfish, given by a USOC Sports Services staff member. Most of the information is available on the Dartfish website, but it was interesting to see the potential uses of the software, which has two main purposes: collecting and visualizing video data, and tracking and tagging the same video.
The video overlay comparisons were fairly cool, but I was most intrigued by the software's ability to capture sensor data. They did some neat things with pressure plates and accelerometers to measure the acceleration of a weightlifter's bar, graphing that data alongside video of the lift itself. Those technologies may not be commercially available -- I was told they were created in-house -- so it is uncertain if coaches in the fencing community could duplicate some of the more interesting uses of the software. It is, however, a useful opposition research tool, as long as enough video source material is collected and properly tagged.
The final session was again run by Mike Pederson, who talked about how he does opponent research without Dartfish. He notes the position on the strip of a touch, and an abbreviation of the phrase. The advantage of this method over video is that it can be easily done in real-time at a tournament without needing to go back, parse, and classify every action. You're still looking for the same thing -- trends and tendencies in where people prefer to be on the strip, as well as what actions they favor. We've done this at several NWFC camps, and if I can find those materials, I'll post them here as well.
Most of the coaches here are from Caribbean and Central/South American countries, so Spanish is the most-spoken language. The USOC has flown in people to do real-time translation via radio earpieces. I understand we're the guinea pigs for this system, which seems to be working well.
Day 1 is in the books; Day 2 should be more technical, with sport psych, strength & conditioning, and nutrition lectures.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
It's Been Such a Long Time
I'm at the Pan-American Sports Organization's "High Level Technical Courses for Fencing Coaches" at the US Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs. What's supposed to happen? 3 days of classes, including strength & conditioning, nutrition, Dartfish, and then 3 days of practical sessions.
This program is being offered with USOC International Relations money, so rather than send US Fencing poobahs on wine-and-dine junkets, they're sponsoring a coaching clinic, using "Learn how we got 6 Gold medals at the Olympics!" as a teaser, and attracting coaches from all over the Pan Am zone. So far I've met some Brazilians and some Chileans. The coaches involved in putting on the clinic aren't really the ones responsible for our medal haul (except in foil), but that doesn't necessarily mean the conference won't be good.
One of the requirements is that we're supposed to disseminate whatever information we get to members of our own federation. I plan on doing an honest assessment over the whole week I'm in Springs...if the information seems incomplete or invalid, I'll say so. If it's good, then credit will go where it's due, and I'll try to get it out to other fencing coaches. From talking to Andrea, the timeline for this conference was extremely quick; the information wasn't up until June, and I didn't know about being selected until Nationals was almost over.
Thus far, I'm impressed - we received cute little swag bags. The one super-interesting item is a 6 DVD set of every single medal match in the 2008 Olympics, compliments of the USOC.
The OTC has changed a bit since I was last here in 2006. Currently MIA -- the library, apparently a victim of budget cuts. That's disconcerting, given that it contained so much interesting information, not only on fencing, but any topic related to sport.
This program is being offered with USOC International Relations money, so rather than send US Fencing poobahs on wine-and-dine junkets, they're sponsoring a coaching clinic, using "Learn how we got 6 Gold medals at the Olympics!" as a teaser, and attracting coaches from all over the Pan Am zone. So far I've met some Brazilians and some Chileans. The coaches involved in putting on the clinic aren't really the ones responsible for our medal haul (except in foil), but that doesn't necessarily mean the conference won't be good.
One of the requirements is that we're supposed to disseminate whatever information we get to members of our own federation. I plan on doing an honest assessment over the whole week I'm in Springs...if the information seems incomplete or invalid, I'll say so. If it's good, then credit will go where it's due, and I'll try to get it out to other fencing coaches. From talking to Andrea, the timeline for this conference was extremely quick; the information wasn't up until June, and I didn't know about being selected until Nationals was almost over.
Thus far, I'm impressed - we received cute little swag bags. The one super-interesting item is a 6 DVD set of every single medal match in the 2008 Olympics, compliments of the USOC.
The OTC has changed a bit since I was last here in 2006. Currently MIA -- the library, apparently a victim of budget cuts. That's disconcerting, given that it contained so much interesting information, not only on fencing, but any topic related to sport.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)